Trading in gold swaps by the Bank for International Settlements, the central bank of the central banks, continued in December. From information in the BIS statement of account for December, published this week --
https://www.bis.org/banking/balsheet/statofacc231231.pdf
-- it is estimated that the volume of the bank’s gold swaps increased in December by 21 tonnes, from 100 tonnes at the end of November to 121 tonnes, up 21%. In the last two months the estimated level of gold swaps is up by 78%
The BIS' gold swaps had fallen to zero as of December 31, 2022, and reached a peak for 2023 of 188 tonnes as of May 31.
Hence trading in gold swaps via the BIS remains active and is still large in volume.
There seem to be no new reasons to alter the assumption that the BIS is continuing to enter these swaps on behalf of the U.S. Federal Reserve. There is no evidence to suggest that any other major central bank is actively trading this much gold, and it remains clear that many central banks are accumulating record levels of physical gold.
The basic transaction that the BIS is believed to undertake is to swap dollars for gold that is transferred from a bullion bank, then to deposit this gold in a gold sight account at a central bank, presumed to be the Fed but almost certainly being the central bank that is using the BIS to execute the gold swap on its behalf.
Given the recent volatility in the level of BIS gold swaps, it seems likely that most are of a short duration. Why a central bank needs the BIS to undertake gold swaps isn’t clear. The swaps are likely connected with short-term trading needs -- perhaps being used to aid suppression the gold price via the futures markets.
The volatility in the volume of swaps is clear from a review of Table B below. Volumes of swaps in 2023 were well below the average seen in the preceding four years but remained significant.
The gold price increased from $2,040 at November 30 to $2,063 at December 29 (per USAGold.com).
Using the December 29 gold price of $2,063, the 121 tonnes of gold swaps carried out via the BIS are valued at about $8 billion. (The corresponding value of the swaps in place at November 30 was around $6.5 billion.) So the recent trading in BIS gold swaps has high dollar value and shows that gold remains a significant monetary asset still actively traded on behalf of at least one central bank, assumed to be the Fed.
As ever with the BIS, it remains unlikely that more information about why it undertakes these transactions will be provided. This secrecy implies that central bank gold policy involves much deception -- that it could be currency or gold market intervention for one or more central banks for which the BIS provides camouflage.
For example, the most recent published BIS annual report does not provide any information on the gold swaps other than confirming that swaps covering 77 tonnes of gold were in place as of March 31, 2023, and the subsequent interim report for the six months to September 30 has no disclosures about the gold swaps in place at that date.
GATA’s research on gold price suppression indicates that an active policy of price suppression was implemented around 30 years ago and was primarily intended to suppress interest rates. Recent updates on this research are provided in the following links to presentations Chris Powell and Bill Murphy made last November at the New Orleans Investment Conference.
https://www.gata.org/node/22886
https://www.gata.org/node/22889
An even more recent lament by GATA Secretary/Treasurer Chris Powell is at the link below. Powell remarks that so much of the recent bullish commentary on the prospects for gold fails to highlight the regular and repeated efforts to suppress the gold price during the past 30 years. He argues that this results in an incomplete picture of the risks as well as the rewards of gold ownership even as the financial outlook for the U.S. government seems fraught amid so much debt built up.
https://www.gata.org/node/22993
The highly influential report below from 2005 abput "Gibson's paradox" remains relevant and highlights work in this area by former U.S. Treasury Secretary and Harvard University President Lawrence Summers:
https://goldensextant.com/gibsonsparadox/
It also remains relevant to highlight the following remarks made in a speech by Summers on September 8, 1999, as reported in the book "The Wealth of Progressive Nations: The Collected Lectures of Lawrence Summers." The remarks below are an extract of a section of the speech titled "A New Economic Paradigm."
"Most important of all, the Clinton-Gore administration has established a new paradigm for the management of our nation's budget, with enormous cumulative benefits for our economy and our citizens. It has become a commonplace to remark on how exceptional today's 4.2% unemployment rate is relative to any expectation at the beginning of the decade. It is no less remarkable that today, after 8.5 years of expansion, long-term interest rates are around 2 percentage points lower than they were at its start."
From this it is reasonable to conclude that keeping interest rates "lower" was considered a priority and succeeding at it was "remarkable." While this is not proof that gold price suppression was undertaken specifically to reduce interest rates, it shows that reducing interest rates was a priority.
Further evidence of this priority is provided by the following link to an interview with Robert Rubin about his time working in the Clinton administration after January 1993. In answer to a question on the initial decision to prioritize deficit reduction, Rubin remarks: "On the other hand, if interest rates go down as a result, then that will stimulate growth, and we thought that the beneficial effect of lower interest rates would outweigh the contractionary impact of the deficit reduction."
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/interviews/rubin.html
Hence there is plenty of evidence that keeping interest rates low was a key priority during the Clinton presidency.
In the context of gold price suppression being used to assist efforts to reduce interest rates, the following report issued by GATA in 2007 with an analysis of the gold market by Frank Veneroso is a notable reference as it confirms that GATA's primary assertions about gold price suppression were plausible:
https://www.gata.org/node/5275
... More recent trends in U.S. government deficits
Reading the remarks of Rubin and Summers on the priorities in the 1990s is a reminder of how far the the fiscal positions of Western nations have worsened since then.
This worsening trend for Western nations, especially the United States, probably reduces the appeal to the BIS of undertaking gold swaps on behalf of any central bank where the liability is to return gold. The trend possibly reduces the appeal of any such swaps to the central bank or banks for which the BIS has been acting. So a report issued by GATA in 2012 is worth revisiting as it highlights the acknowledgment of gold price suppression by a former chairman of the BIS, Jelle Zijlstra, a Dutch politician, economist, and central banker. It seems likely, therefore, that BIS management understands what the swaps are being used for and why they require camouflage:
https://www.gata.org/node/11304
The continuing conundrum facing the Federal Reserve about raising dollar interest rates has seemingly been resolved for now with the recent announcement of no change to rates and no reference to increases being considered.
Despite its regularly opaque rhetoric, the Fed needs to bolster confidence in the U.S. Treasuries market when the U.S. government’s ever-increasing debt has been so controversial recently. Forthcoming new debt issuance is going to be monitored closely by investors.
The Treasury Department's monthly report on December revenue and expenditure points toward at best a similar level of cash outflows in the current fiscal year to the underlying deficit of about $2.1trillion in the year to September 30, 2023.
See Appendix A in the following link for an explanation of the $2.1 trillion deficit in fiscal 2023:
https://www.gata.org/node/22883
The trends behind the deficit are not positive, with higher expenditures and much-reported higher interest costs in the December monthly statement. It seems that the run rate of gross interest costs reported in the last 12 months should now be passing $1 trillion, but a surprising reduction in the annual interest payments on the $7 trillion of Treasury debt held by federal government-sponsored trust funds has been reported.
On a rolling 12-month basis the gross interest cost reported in the monthly statements is $957 billion. On the face of it the reduced interest charge on the Treasury debt held by the trust funds is counterintuitive and perhaps is indicative of the pressure to keep a lid on interest costs.
The December monthly report on the federal government’s finances is here:
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/reports-statements/mts/mts1223.pdfis
In these circumstances the room for the Fed to raise interest rates in the next few years seems restricted and hence it seems likely as noted above that the BIS and some of its members might be questioning the role of the bank in these swaps and the obligation to make future deliveries of gold, since the Fed may be unable to move interest rates high enough to contain inflation.
In this context the relatively stable price of oil is relevant as it seems that strong forces want to keep oil prices subdued despite developments that might be expected to result in higher prices, such as production cuts by major producers and the dangers to shipments through the Red Sea.
With 2024 being a presidential election year in the United States there appear to be strong political incentives to contain oil prices and that even recent moves to consolidate the number of oil producers in the U.S. might be tacitly encouraged in return for commitments to keep production high.
The success or otherwise of such efforts might be a clue to the timing of a gold price reset as there appears to be little effort by the Fed and Treasury Department to accept that federal debt levels may be dangerously high now.
The report at the following link, which reviews the possible connection between hedge funds' basis trades in U.S. Treasuries and the Fed’s program of quantitative tightening could be read as another sign of how difficult it is to find purchasers of U.S. Treasuries at current prices:
https://www.gata.org/node/22873
The link below contains a commentary on the apparent enrichment of certain hedge funds and the individuals involved as a result of the apparent support from the Fed to the hedge fund basis trade used to effect "quantitative tightening":
https://www.gata.org/node/22972
Again, it seems appropriate to note that a report titled “Living with High Public Debt” authored by Serkan Arslanalp and Barry Eichengreen was published in August 2023 by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. This report reinforces just how difficult it is to handle high federal government debt with spending far in excess of revenue.
The report can be found at the Kansas City Fed's internet site and at GATA's:
https://www.gata.org/sites/default/files/Living_With_High_Public_Debt_Sep_2_2023.pdf
Here is an excerpt from the conclusions:
"Looking forward, the challenges are daunting. Given aging populations, governments will have to find additional finance for healthcare and pensions. They will have to finance spending on defense, climate change abatement, and adaptation, and the digital transition. A growing number of low-income countries are already in debt distress.
"Living with high public debt therefore means avoiding steps that make a bad situation worse. This means minimizing unproductive public spending. It means targeting social transfers as a way of limiting pressures on the expenditure side. It means limiting contingent liabilities by, inter alia, adequately regulating banks and avoiding recapitalization costs.
"It means contemplating tax increases where revenues are low by international standards. It means further developing financial markets where markets are underdeveloped and where a diverse population of local investors in debt securities is absent. It means embracing legal and procedural changes that streamline and speed restructuring for countries whose debts are unsustainable.
"This modest medicine does not make for a happy diagnosis. But it makes for a realistic one."
In the circumstances vividly described in the report it seems ridiculous that the price of gold was relatively subdued during 2023. The report offers yet more reason to suspect that gold swaps undertaken by the BIS, probably on behalf of the Fed, are being used to suppress the dollar gold price.
Table A below highlights the level of gold swaps reported in the annual reports of the BIS back to 2010, when the bank's use of gold swaps appears to have begun. At only one year-end since then, in March 2016, has the swap level been zero.
The BIS's recently published interim report as of September 30, 2023, discloses that the BIS still holds 102 tonnes of its own gold and that few of its activities in derivatives involve central banks. An assumption that the gold held by the BIS remains at 102 tonnes has been used in this note to make the estimate of the bank's gold swap level. The low level of derivatives reported by the BIS using central banks as counterparties at the year-end seems a sensible reason to assume that the swaps are almost certainly done with gold bullion banks rather than central banks. Historically, the first swaps described below were done with bullion banks.
* * *
... Historical context ...
The BIS rarely comments publicly on its gold activities, but its first use of gold swaps was considered important enough to cause the bank to give some background information to the Financial Times for an article published July 29, 2010, coinciding with publication of the bank's 2009-10 annual report.
The general manager of the BIS at the time, Jaime Caruana, said the gold swaps were "regular commercial activities" for the bank, and he confirmed that they were carried out with commercial banks and so did not involve central banks. It also seems highly likely that the BIS' remaining swaps are still all made with commercial banks, because the BIS annual report has never disclosed a gold swap between the BIS and a major central bank.
The swap transactions potentially created a mismatch at the BIS, which may have ended up being long unallocated gold (the gold held in BIS sight accounts at major central banks) and short allocated gold (the gold required to be returned to swap counterparties). This possible mismatch has not been reported by the BIS.
The gold banking activities of the BIS have been a regular part of the services it offers to central banks since the bank's establishment 90 years ago. The first annual report of the BIS explains these activities in some detail:
http://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/archive/ar1931_en.pdf
A June 2008 presentation made by the BIS to potential central bank members at its headquarters in Basel, Switzerland, noted that the bank's services to its members include secret interventions in the gold and foreign exchange markets:
https://www.gata.org/node/11012
The use of gold swaps to take gold held by commercial banks and then deposit it in gold sight accounts held in the name of the BIS at major central banks doesn’t appear ever to have been as large a part of the BIS’ gold banking business as it has been in recent years, although the recent declines suggest this is changing.
As of March 31, 2010, excluding gold owned by the BIS, there were 1,706 tonnes held in the name of the BIS in gold sight accounts at major central banks, of which 346 tonnes or 20% were sourced from gold swaps from commercial banks.
If the BIS was adopting the level of disclosure made by publicly held companies, such as commercial banks, some explanation of these changes probably would have been required by the accounting regulators. This irony may not be lost on those dealing with regulatory activities at the BIS. Presumably the shrinkage of the BIS' gold banking business shows that even central banks now prefer to hold their own gold or hold it in earmarked form -- that is, as allocated gold.
A review of Table B below highlights recent BIS activity with gold swaps, and despite the recent declines, the recent positions estimated from the BIS monthly statements have regularly been large, especially in early 2022, and the volume of trading has been significant.
No explanation for this continuing use of swaps has been published by the BIS. Indeed, no comment on the bank's use of gold swaps has been offered since 2010.
This gold is supplied by bullion banks via the swaps to the BIS. The gold is then deposited in BIS gold sight accounts (unallocated gold accounts) at major central banks such as the Federal Reserve.
The reasons for this activity have never been fully explained by the BIS and various conjectures have been made as to why the BIS has facilitated it. One conjecture is that the swaps are a mechanism for the return of gold secretly supplied by central banks to cover shortfalls in the gold markets. The use of the BIS to facilitate this trade suggests of a desire to conceal the rationale for the transactions.
As can be seen in Table A below, the BIS has used gold swaps extensively since its financial year 2009-10. No use of swaps is reported in the bank's annual reports for at least 10 years prior to the year ended March 2010.
The February 2021 estimate of the bank's gold swaps (552 tonnes) was higher than any level of swaps reported by the BIS at its March year-end since March 2010. The swaps reported at March 2021 were at the highest year-end level reported, as is clear from Table A.
-----
Table A -- Swaps reported in BIS annual reports
March 2010: 346 tonnes.
March 2011: 409 tonnes.
March 2012: 355 tonnes.
March 2013: 404 tonnes.
March 2014: 236 tonnes.
March 2015: 47 tonnes.
March 2016: 0 tonnes.
March 2017: 438 tonnes.
March 2018: 361 tonnes.
March 2019: 175 tonnes
March 2020: 326 tonnes
March 2021: 490 tonnes
March 2022: 358 tonnes
March 2023: 77 tonnes
-----
The table below reports the estimated swap levels since August 2018. It can be seen that the BIS is actively involved in trading gold swaps and other gold derivatives with changes from month to month reported in excess of 100 tonnes in this period.
-----
Table B -- Swaps estimated by GATA from BIS monthly statements of account
Month ….. Swaps
& year … in tonnes
Dec-23 ...../121
Nov-23 ..../100
Oct-23 ..../68
Sep-23 ..../96
Aug-23 ..../129
Jul-23 .... /103
Jun-23.... /87
May-23 .... /188
Apr-23 .... /135
Mar-23 .... /77*
Feb-23 ... /136
Jan-23 ... /103
Dec-22 ... /0
Nov-22 ... /105
Oct-22 ..... /7
Sep-22 ...../57
Aug -22 ..... /75
Jul-22 ..... /56
Jun-22 ..... /202
May-22 ..... /270
Apr-22 ..... /315
Mar-22 .... /358
Feb-22 .... /472
Jan-22 ..... /501
Dec-21.... /414
Nov-21.... /451
Oct-21.... /414
Sep-21 .... /438
Aug-21 .... /464
Jul-21 .... /502
Jun-21 ..../471
May-21 ..../517
Apr-21 .... /472
Mar-21.... /490±
Feb-21 ...../552
Jan-21 .... /523
Dec-20 .... /545
Nov-20 .... /520
Oct-20 .... /519
Sep-20...../ 520
Aug-20...../ 484
Jul-20 ..... / 474
Jun-20 .... / 391
May-20 .... / 412
Apr-20 .... / 328
Mar-20 .... / 326**
Feb-20 .... / 326
Jan-20 .... / 320
Dec-19 .... / 313
Nov-19 .... / 250
Oct-19 .... / 186
Sep-19 .... / 128
Aug-19 .... / 162
Jul-19 ..... / 95
Jun-19 .... / 126
May-19 .... / 78
Apr-19 ..... / 88
Mar-19 .... / 175
Feb-19 .... / 303
Jan-19 .... / 247
Dec-18 .... / 275
Nov-18 .... / 308
Oct-18 .... / 372
Sep-18 .... / 238
Aug-18 .... / 370
* The estimate originally reported by GATA was 78 tonnes, but the BIS annual report states 77 tonnes. It is believed that slightly different gold prices account for the difference.
± The estimate originally reported by GATA was 487 tonnes, but the BIS annual report states 490 tonnes, It is believed that slightly different gold prices account for the difference.
** The estimate originally reported by GATA was 332 tonnes, but the BIS annual report states 326 tonnes. It is believed that slightly different gold prices account for the difference.
GATA uses gold prices quoted by USAGold.com to estimate the level of gold swaps held by the BIS at month-ends.
- - - - -
As noted already, the BIS in recent times has refused to explain its activities in the gold market, nor for whom the bank is acting:
Despite this reticence the BIS has almost certainly acted on behalf of central banks in taking out these swaps, as they are the BIS’ owners and control its Board of Directors. Historically, the BIS has often acted on behalf of the Federal Reserve.
This refusal to explain prompts some observers to believe that the BIS acts as an agent for central banks intervening surreptitiously in the gold and currency markets, providing those central banks with access to gold as well as protection from exposure of their interventions.
As mentioned above, it is possible that the swaps provide a mechanism for bullion banks to return gold originally lent to them by central banks to cover bullion bank shortfalls of gold. Some commentators have suggested that a portion of the gold held by exchange-traded funds and managed by bullion banks is sourced directly from central banks.
About the author
